GRE to GMAT Conversion How Does Your Score Compare

For more than 60 years, business schools have used Graduate Management Admissions Test (GMAT) scores to compare MBA applicants and decide who will be enrolled in their business programs and who will not. According to the Graduate Management Admissions Council, the organization that administers the GMAT, nine out of 10 global MBA students submit GMAT scores as part of the admissions process. But the GMAT is not the only standardized exam that MBA applicants can take. A growing number of schools are accepting Graduate Record Examination (GRE) scores in addition to GMAT scores. The GRE is commonly used by graduate schools to assess applicant readiness. Currently, there are more than 1,000 business schools around the world accepting GRE scores as part of the MBA admissions process. That number grows every year. Comparing GRE and GMAT Scores Although both admissions exams cover similar domains and utilize many of the same types of questions to assess test-takers, the GMAT and the GRE are scored on different scales. The GRE is scored on a 130-170 scale, and the GMAT is scored on a 200-800 scale. The difference in scoring means you cant make an apples-to-apples comparison between the scores. Sometimes, the best way to compare scaled scores from two different tests is by comparing the percentiles. But this isnt really possible with GMAT scores and GRE scores. The normed populations are different, which means you cant accurately convert and compare percentiles from the two tests. Another issue is the way the scores are used. Unlike the GMAT, the GRE does not provide a total score. The GRE test makers recommend keeping GRE Verbal Reasoning scores and GRE Quantitative Reasoning separate when making admissions decisions. The makers of the GMAT, on the other hand, recommend using the GMAT total score when making admissions decisions. Predicting GMAT Scores Based on GRE Scores Business schools are accustomed to making admissions decisions based on GMAT scores, and many of them prefer to use the context of the GMAT to interpret GRE scores. To make things as easy as possible for business schools, ETS, the makers of the GRE, created a GRE comparison tool that makes it quick and easy for business schools to predict an applicants GMAT score based on scores from the Verbal Reasoning and Quantitative Reasoning sections of the GRE. This makes it much easier for admissions reps to compare candidates who took the GRE with candidates who took the GMAT. The GRE comparison tool uses a multiple linear regression equation to predict total GMAT scores based on GRE General Test scores. The formula is as follows: GMAT Total score -2080.75 6.38*GRE Verbal Reasoning score 10.62*GRE Quantitative Reasoning score This tool also uses regression equations to predict GMAT Verbal and Quantitative scores from the GRE Verbal Reasoning and Quantitative Reasoning scores. The formulas are as follows: GMAT Verbal score -109.49 0.912*GRE Verbal Reasoning scoreGMAT Quantitative score -158.42 1.243*GRE Quantitative Reasoning score Using the GRE Comparison Tool You can use the formulas shown above to convert your GRE score into a GMAT score. However, the GRE comparison tool is the quickest, easiest way to convert your GRE score into a GMAT score. This tool is available on the ETS website and is free to use. You do not have to register on the site, create an account or provide your email address. To use the GRE comparison tool, youll need your GRE Verbal Reasoning score and your GRE Quantitative Reasoning score. Enter those two scores into the provided boxes in the online form. Youll then be provided with several predicted GMAT scores: a GMAT total score, a GMAT Verbal score, and a GMAT quantitative score. GRE and GMAT Comparison Charts You can find a lot of different charts online that can be used to convert and compare GRE and GMAT scores. These charts are easy to use, but they are not always entirely accurate. If a chart was the most appropriate way to convert the scores, the ETS would provide a simple chart. To get the most accurate conversion and comparison, you need to use the GRE comparison tool. And since this is the tool that business schools will be using to convert and compare scores, you can be confident in the accuracy of the tool. Youll be seeing the same predicted GMAT score that the business school sees when they review your application.

Gender Roles And Stereotypes The Kiss By The Dunphy s,...

The television series Modern Family attempts to provide an updated representation of the contemporary American Family. The program is centred on the familial interactions of three interrelated families; the Pritchet’s, the Dunphy’s, and the Pritchet-Tucker’s. Each family is unique as it depicts a specific family structure (or type) seen within society at large, representing a blended discourse of gender, race and sexuality. Superficially, it appears the families do represent segments of current society, however a textual analysis of the episode, â€Å"The Kiss† revels that heteronormative ideals linked to the nuclear family structure and associative gender roles are juxtaposed upon the characters and families portrayed. In fact, the program promotes specific gender roles and stereotypes of both women and homosexuals. To better articulate the gender roles and stereotypes imposed upon the characters in Modern Family it is beneficial to examine scholarly definitions of family, specifically those associated with Structural Functionalism. Based on research conducted with Australian aboriginal families, George Malinowski argued the family is comprised of a â€Å"man, woman and their children† (Mitchell, 2012, p. 29). He claimed the universality of this definition of family was predicated based on this familial representation occurring repeatedly within society. Malinowski’s family unit is seen within Modern Family with the Dunphy family comprised of Phil, Claire (Jay Pritchet’s

Freedom of Expression Our First Amendment Rights Essay Example For Students

Freedom of Expression Our First Amendment Rights Essay What is art? Can it be defined in any single painting, or sculpture? Is it even something that can be seen, or does it have to be experienced? The term art is so vague that it can be applied to almost anything, really. Mostly, however, art should be that which frees our imagination. It connects our conscious with our subconscious, putting into a visual form what we feel and think. It allows us to explore our inner self and fill that urge to understand our minds and our universe. Art helps us to see beyond the ordinary, to see what is in our hearts without being blinded by reality. When an artist creates a painting, it is not to create a picture; it is to create a feeling or mood. The purpose is to convey an emotion, and, it is hoped, to make the viewer experience that same emotion. The painting is really just the final result. Picasso once said the thing that counts, in painting, is the intention of the artistWhat counts is what one wants to do, and not what one does In the end what was important is the intention one had. So, what happens when artists are judged only on their final result, with no consideration to the purpose of their artwork? Censorship happens. Thats right, every day in America, Land of the Free, another artist falls victim to The Censor. Everyday, despite rights guaranteed by the constitution, people are being oppressed-by school officials, librarians, committee chairpersons, and even by those in government positions. Its time everyone, everywhere, stood up for Freedom of Expression, and put and end to censorship. In September of this year, the Brooklyn Museum of Art planned an exhibit of British artwork entitled Sensation: Young British Artists from the Saatchi Collection, the controversial art exhibit which, on its world tour, has been shown in Germany and England. The exhibit, as well as the majority of other artwork on display in the museum, was to be funded by the National Endowment for the Arts. The NEA is a government agency that grants federal money to artists and organizations in an attempt to serve the public good by nurturing the expression of human creativity, supporting the cultivation of community spirit, and fostering the recognition and appreciation of the excellence and diversity of our nations artistic accomplishments. The organization was prepared to share part of its 98,000 dollars of appropriated funds, until several weeks before the exhibit was to open. At that time, Mayor Rudolph Guiliani, after having viewed the exhibit, threatened to withdraw city financial support to the museum. The Mayor labeled the exhibit sick and offensive to Catholics, and made no secret that his objections were based on his personal dislike of the contents of the show. He criticized the work of Chris Ofili, specifically a painting called The Holy Virgin Mary, because of its use of elephant dung. Ofili, a British artist of Nigerian descent, uses elephant dung in many of his works as a reference to his African roots. As an observant Catholic himself, he denies that his work is either anti-Catholic or anti-religious. He meant the dung to be a symbol of life and providence, however this simple explanation was not enough to satisfy Guilani. His threats to withdraw funding stood firm. Offili told the New York Times, The people who are attacking this painting are attacking their own interpretation, not mine. Damien Hirst, whose display was also part of the show, said that the mayor may as well say, I only like Picasso and if you dont show it then Im going to cut your funding. Its just pure censorship. He may be right, and the Brooklyn Museum of Art sued the city on September 28th, protesting the mayors threat to freeze millions of dollars in funds. To the relief of museum officials and art lovers across the country, the courts ruled on November 1st in favor of the Brooklyn Museum of Art and against New York City and Mayor Rudolph W. Giuliani. Even those who privately disliked Sensation and the way i t was handled by the Brooklyn Museum couldnt help but feel that their own fates had been on the line, too. .u4350c658275a9d6f8124be61d643d53f , .u4350c658275a9d6f8124be61d643d53f .postImageUrl , .u4350c658275a9d6f8124be61d643d53f .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u4350c658275a9d6f8124be61d643d53f , .u4350c658275a9d6f8124be61d643d53f:hover , .u4350c658275a9d6f8124be61d643d53f:visited , .u4350c658275a9d6f8124be61d643d53f:active { border:0!important; } .u4350c658275a9d6f8124be61d643d53f .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u4350c658275a9d6f8124be61d643d53f { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u4350c658275a9d6f8124be61d643d53f:active , .u4350c658275a9d6f8124be61d643d53f:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u4350c658275a9d6f8124be61d643d53f .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u4350c658275a9d6f8124be61d643d53f .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u4350c658275a9d6f8124be61d643d53f .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u4350c658275a9d6f8124be61d643d53f .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u4350c658275a9d6f8124be61d643d53f:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u4350c658275a9d6f8124be61d643d53f .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u4350c658275a9d6f8124be61d643d53f .u4350c658275a9d6f8124be61d643d53f-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u4350c658275a9d6f8124be61d643d53f:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Corporal Punishment Is Physical Abuse EssayTheir interpretation of the First Amendment was at stake, which lets a public museum show work without fear of financial retribution if someone in the government finds the work offensive. The ruling was a narrow victory in the fight against censorship, and it is neither the first nor the last. There are some that still believe that the city has a right to choose what artwork to fund. People can do what they want to do and they can draw what they want to draw, but, Senator Bob Smith said, the government doesnt have to fund this garbage. He is not alone in his opinion. New York City official Michael D. Hess sent several letters to the museums director, Arnold L. Lehman, warning that the museum cannot proceed with the exhibit as planned, and threatened to not only cut funding for the museum, but also warned the museum that it would loose its lease if the exhibit was opened as planned. He agreed with Mayor Giulianis statement that where it comes to Catholic bashing, this kind of thing is never treated as sensitively as it sometimes is in other areas. If this were a desecration of a symbol in another area, I think there would be more sensitivity about this than a desecration of a symbol that involves Catholics. Much of the opposition was based on the idea that if the mayor action, was in the best interest of the city. The mayors action displayed his lack of respect for the First Amendment rights of the residents of New York, and also his disdain for the reputation of New York City as a world-class center of art and culture. The entire arts community should be grateful to Director Arno ld Lehman and the BMAs Board of Directors for standing firm on the right of artists and museum-goers to make their own decisions without interference from the government, said Joan Bertin, Executive Director of the National Coalition Against Censorship. If the city chooses to fund the arts, it simply cannot pick and choose what art is offensive and what is not. In addition, That judgment varies so widely and is so subjective that, if it were the test, publicly funded art institutions would likely have little of interest to offer beyond the most inoffensive and conventional art, Michelle Coffy, Program Director of the National Campaign for Freedom of Expression, says. It is not appropriate to censor something based solely on a failure to understand and a personal dislike. In this case, the mayor and other critics may simply be revealing their own misinterpretation of the varied cultural and artistic traditions on which artists draw, having obviously misunderstood the whole point of art in the first place-expression.